Saturday, June 5, 2010

Rhetorical Analysis #5: Analysis of Aragorn's speech.

I forgot to do #4. I am fail :(

The speech I'm analyzing for this analysis is Aragorn's speech to the Men of the West in The Return of the King movie. It goes like this:

"Sons of Gondor, of Rohan, my brothers! I see in your eyes the same fear that would take the heart of me. A day may come when the courage of men fails, when we forsake our friends, and break all bonds of fellowship; but it is not this day! An hour of wolves, and shattered shields, when the Age of Men comes crashing down; but it is not this day! This day we fight! By all that you you hold dear on this good earth, I bid you stand, Men of the West!"
-Aragorn.

I got that transcript off of wikipedia, which is cool.

#1: What is the speech's goal?
The goal is to persuade the Men of the West to make a last stand against Sauron, the Dark Lord of Mordor.

#2: What is the speech's argument?
That the Men of the West should stand and fight because they will be victorious--the Age of Men will come crashing down at one point but, if they fight, that won't happen today. Ergo, they should fight to salvage the Age of Men.

#3: Who is the audience?
The audience is the small group of men of Gondor and Rohan (and also some hobbits and a dwarf and an elf and also Gandalf) who are gathered on the field in front of the Black Gate of Mordor who are about to fight Sauron's forces in the culminating battle of the war against Sauron.

#4: How?
Aragorn first appeals to ethos by establishing his credibility with his audience. He reminds them that he shares similar values with his audience by calling them his "brothers." He also appeals to pathos by reminding them of "all that [they] hold dear on this good earth." Aragorn thus appeals to their sense of rightness and justice, but, most importantly, to their desire to defend Middle Earth's goodness against Mordor's evilness. He also addresses the audience's fear that they will fail by describing the day when the Age of Men will finally fail as "a day of wolves and shattered shields when the Age of Men comes crashing down." However, he uses this fear to spur the audience to fight: "It is not this day. This day, we fight." Aragorn thus successfully uses both ethos and pathos in his short speech to encourage his men to fight for their freedom.

STAR:

Sufficient--Aragorn doesn't really offer any evidence that the Men of the West will succeed and Mordor will fail. His role as Elessar perhaps encourages his men to believe that since Aragorn says that the Age of Men won't fail today, he's probably right. Aragorn's speech is mostly emotional and not logical; he doesn't draw from facts, since the army of Mordor is much larger than his own army. Therefore, the evidence he gives is all emotional--because they believe in their cause, the men of the West will prevail. Therefore, depending on how you look at it, Aragorn either fails to give sufficient logical evidence, or he succeeds at giving sufficient emotional evidence to encourage the Men of the West to fight.

Typical--the Men of the West are all pretty typical people, and they all accept the speech, so the evidence Aragorn gives obviously worked for them. I don't know that a rational person under less emotional duress would accept the argument, though, since the odds are obviously against them. However, a cause-driven person wanting to believe that they aren't about to be massacred by the overwhelmingly large opposing forces would probably still buy into Aragorn's argument.

Accurate--He does present the counterargument that one day the Age of Men will fail, and his frightening description of that day doesn't set the counterargument up as an easy thing that he can just push over. Instead, he assuages his men's fears by conveying the idea that while the Age of Men will one day fail, if they fight, they can stave off that time until later, which seems to be pretty effective.

Relevant--The speech is short and to the point, so I think there isn't any extraneous material here. Everything he says is directly related to encouraging the Men of the West to fight; there isn't anything extraneous or anything that could be interpreted as a red herring.

#5: Effective?
Yes. The speech is obviously effective in that it does rally the Men of the West in the movie, encourage them, and enable them to fight and win. I think the speech is largely emotional and doesn't draw from anything logical except for Aragorn's drive to win, which might not make it effective to any other audience; however, for this particular audience, the speech is just perfect.

Here is a picture demonstrating the speech's effectiveness:



THE END!

Ps. The best part of this experience was that I wrote this post while watching this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ltps17if3t8&feature=related
Watch it until you start to really understand the intensity of that hair. It kept surprising me all the way through, springing out at me in every screen shot like a tiger. A terrifying, but engaging, experience.

8 comments:

  1. Nicely done.

    Battle cry speeches often don't seem that logical, but emotionally they can be quite effective. Is it unfair to say that public speeches (i.e. political speeches, etc.) often appeal more to the emotional than the rational, since they must generate support and enthusiasm in a rather short amount of time? Does that make this kind of speech both cool and dangerous, since you could take Aragorn's speech and have the opposing force use it to the same effect? Interesting stuff to think about, at least to me.

    Thanks for the post, but I'm sorry your teacher assigns lame homework that requires hijacking your personal blog. It's not hip, technically savvy, or good teaching. So that bites. But you did a good job.

    ReplyDelete
  2. GOOD JOB BRO.

    Basically I love you forever for doing this for your class. <3 You are the best person ever.

    I'm sorry that that is all I have to say.

    ReplyDelete
  3. i loved it. all of it. comments included.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Oh! Oh! Do Theoden's speech next! That is the one that my dad says pretty much all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Kylie, you are not a vampire, but you were created to live forever in eternal love.

    arohanui, kia kaha

    Rob
    robholding@orcon.net.nz

    (great analyses of the speech by the way. )

    ReplyDelete
  6. I just have to say thank you!! I'm also doing an analysis of this speech. And I was a bit lost since we have to write at least 600 words. But I love-love-love LotR, so it wasn't that hard. But you really helped me out with the ethos, pathos and logos! Thank you!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Here is why you miss the main point of the speech, in the words of Tolkien himself: "The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision." This is a spiritual and moral battle that the King (pretty easy to see what King is being referred to in light of what Tolkien says) is referring to, against the forces of darkness. Unless one understands this, the point of the speech and all the books/movies will be entirely lost. An outsider to the faith may enjoy and even find some significance in these works, but their fullness will NEVER be appreciated without this basic understanding given to us by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This speech by Aragorn is among J.R.R.Tolkein's many, nearly countless, borrowings from Norse culture, history, and mythology.

      This particular battle speech by Aragorn is almost entirely borrowed, word for word (in translation, obviously) from a semi-historical (semi-legendary) Old Norse recount, preserved among the wonderfully insightful collection of sagas found in Iceland.

      In its original context, the speech was given not as an opening battle-cry, but after a slight retreat from battle, during the resulting pause if bloody chaos. The Norse (close descendants of Vikings, in this case) warriors found themselves overwhelmed by an ever-growing force of Crusader-sorts of Kings' armies; and, their evaluation, as they caught their breath, was that the battle was all but lost, and they would soon be massacred, in a most ironic sacrifice of 'heathens,' in the name of Christ.

      Aragorn's speech is essentially a slightly abridged version of the rallying cry, which moved the Norse fighters to rally. This reinvigorated vitality was not expected by the opposing armies, who had hedged victory upon the surrender of the exhausted Northmen (as opposed to Tolkein's, "Men of the West," they were addressed as, "Men of the North").

      The resurgence of Norse en masse on the battlefield caused a confused & hesitant breakdown of cohesion, among the multi-kingdom forces, Said confusion inevitably caused the lines to break; and as soon as a handful of men deserted, the entire armies followed suit.

      The Norse credited the victory to the speaker who inspired them - not a warrior, but a Norse woman of some respected status, who was among few emergency medics behind the Norse front. Later, more romanticized, elaborations of the story - some of which turn it into an epic poem - elevate the speech-giver to the glorious - though fictional (mythical, that is), status of a Valkyrie.
      : )

      Delete